![\"41relg8fadl\"](\"http:\/\/simoningsmirror.files.wordpress.com\/2009\/10\/41relg8fadl-_ss500.jpg?w=300\")
<\/p>\nThis is a book about the nature of the eye. It is about all the eyes that are, and ever have been, and may yet be. It is about how we see the world, and how other eyes see it. It is about what happens to the world when it is looked at, and about what happens to us when we look at each other. It is about evolution, chemistry, optics, colour, psychology, anthropology, and consciousness. It is about what we know, and it is also about how we came to know it. So this is also a book about personal ambition, folly, failure, confusion, and language.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Ings argues convincingly that the eye has had a profound effect on our language, perception, philosophy and even consciousness\u2026 Ings deals with these, as he does all parts of this thoroughly engaging book, with refreshing clarity, enthusiasm and vigour. It\u2019s a real eye-opener, if you\u2019ll pardon the pun. This is a book about the nature of the eye. It is about all the eyes that are, and ever have been, and may yet be. It is about how we see the world, and how other eyes see it. … Continue reading
\nDoug Johnstone,\u00a0The Times<\/a>, March 10, 2007<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\nIn The Eye: A Natural History, the novelist and science writer Simon Ings explores evolution\u2019s alleged masterpiece from several perspectives, including optics, physiology, history, medicine and biochemistry. It is a rich and eclectic survey, with an intriguing nugget on almost every page. Ings has done his homework and is not afraid to find fault with new ideas that don\u2019t pass muster.
\nGraham Farmelo,\u00a0Sunday Telegraph<\/a>, March 24<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n[Ings] rightly asserts that \u2018the story of the eye is epic\u2019, and this is an impressive attempt to summarise its 538-million-year history. There are times when the encyclopaedic scale of the endeavour rather overwhelms the reader, but it\u2019s easy to share his genuine wonder at the sheer oddness of some of the mechanisms of sight.<\/div>\nP D Smith, the\u00a0Guardian<\/a>, June 2<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nIn this ambitious work, Ings reaches into chemistry, evolutionary biology, anthropology, psychology, aesthetics and his own fertile imagination to produce an agglomeration of ideas and themes, aimed at neither the specialist nor the idiot, but somewhere tantalisingly in between. In many ways it\u2019s the perfectly judged popular-science book: he assumes little or no prior knowledge, but he does take for granted an open mind and a certain curiosity. His book will bring out the intelligent 12-year-old in us all. You may even look on the world with new eyes.
\nMarcus Berkmann,\u00a0The Spectator<\/a>, March 31<\/strong>
\n(requires subscription; the review has been reprinted\u00a0here<\/a>)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nIngs has succeeded in writing an elegant, entertaining and up-to-date overview of cutting-edge research. He tells the story \u201cepisodically\u201d, in a \u201cmix of history, science and anecdote\u201d that is utterly compelling.
\nGail Vines, the\u00a0Independent<\/a>, April 25<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nIngs has a good eye for memorable anecdotes and striking facts. More importantly, The Eye is always readable, and Ings is a very good explainer of scientific concepts.
\nRobert Hanks, the\u00a0Telegraph<\/a>, March 18<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nThe evolution of the human eye sounds a potentially arid subject, but not as treated by Simon Ings, who seamlessly blends natural history with personal observation (the progress of his baby daughter), visual conundrums (illustrations punctuate the text), and a real sense of wonder.
\nThere are fascinating facts galore: our eyes are never still, for example. As well as entertaining, it\u2019s philosophically profound: showing how our eyes, far from simply absorbing the world, are tools with which we construct our own reality.
\nKatie Owen, the Sunday Telegraph, 27 January 2008<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nVoles communicate by leaving trails of urine that (happily for the hungry kestrel) reflect ultraviolet light. Simon Ings will cheerfully supply you with a whole feast of such tasty morsels in this expansive history of the eye. But while his book may satisfy a nerdy hunger for trivia, it is much more than just a compendium of information, ambitiously blending science with philosophy and drawing on history and anecdotes. The latter, which often focus on his daughter, are impressive for somehow avoiding mawkishness; in one of the book\u2019s most moving sections, Ings considers their respective ageing and sight. It all makes for a surprisingly appealing and readable book, helped along by the odd judicious diagram. Read it and you will never see things in the same way.
\nHermione Buckland-Hoby, the Observer, January 27<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nThe mirror of the soul? In Homo sapiens, maybe. But in this account of that remarkable organ, the eye, Ings goes beyond the human\u2026 The more complex his material, the clearer his prose becomes. He is equally at ease with mathematics, philosophy, palaeontology and history in this cornucopia of facts and folklore about the eye\u2026 this far-ranging and wonderfully eclectic work is popular science at its best.
\nRoss Leckie,\u00a0The Times<\/a>,\u00a0January 25<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nCharles Darwin wrote that thinking about the evolution of the eye gave him a \u201ccold shudder\u201d. The organ\u2019s complexity tested his theory to the limits, yet so necessary has eyesight become to species\u2019 survival that some scientists estimate the eye has evolved independently at least 40 times. As Ings puts it, \u201cThere are only a handful of really good ideas in nature\u201d, and eyesight is one of them. There is a lot of science in Ings\u2019s account, but it is leavened by engaging forays into history and biography. He relates such fascinating subjects as the ability of the Thai Moken tribe to see underwater, and Woody Allen\u2019s rare skill in raising the inner corners of his eyebrows.
\nIan Critchley, The Sunday Times, January 27<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\u2018Popular science\u2019 now too often refers to books about penguins\u2019 feet and the like, so it is a relief to find a work that demonstrates genuine learning and intellectual passion. Simon Ings takes us elegantly through the 600-million-year history of the eye, explaining its differing functions in humans and animals, and discussing philosophical thoughts about vision. The result is a narrative as arresting and remarkable as any fiction, accessible but complete, with the reader assumed to be an intelligent adult on the lookout for something substantial. An excellent guide to one of the world\u2019s true wonders.
\nthe Telegraph, February 2<\/strong>
\n <\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"