{"id":3991,"date":"2024-09-21T18:33:04","date_gmt":"2024-09-21T18:33:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.simonings.net\/?p=3991"},"modified":"2024-09-25T18:38:45","modified_gmt":"2024-09-25T18:38:45","slug":"what-about-the-unknown-knowns","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.simonings.net\/?p=3991","title":{"rendered":"What about the unknown knowns?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Reading Nate Silver’s On the Edge and The Art of Uncertainty by David Spiegelhalter for the Spectator<\/a><\/p>\n

The Italian actuary Bruno de Finetti, writing in 1931, was explicit: \u201cProbability,\u201d he wrote, \u201cdoes not exist.\u201d<\/p>\n

Probability, it\u2019s true, is simply the measure of an observer\u2019s uncertainty, and in The Art of Uncertainty British statistician David Spiegelhalter explains how his extraordinary and much-derided science has evolved to the point where it is even able to say useful things about why things have turned out the way they have, based purely on present evidence. Spiegelhalter was a member of the Statistical Expert Group of the 2018 UK Infected Blood Inquiry, and you know his book\u2019s a winner the moment he tells you that between 650 and 3,320 people nationwide died from tainted transfusions. By this late point, along with the pity and the horror, you have a pretty good sense of the labour and ingenuity that went into those peculiarly specific, peculiarly wide-spread numbers.<\/p>\n

At the heart of Spiegelhalter\u2019s maze, of course, squats Donald Rumsfeld, once pilloried for his convoluted syntax at a 2002 Department of Defense news briefing, and now immortalised for what came out of it: the best ever description of what it\u2019s like to act under conditions of uncertainty. Rumsfeld\u2019s \u201cunknown unknowns\u201d weren\u2019t the last word, however; Slovenian philosopher Slavoj \u017di\u017eek (it had to be \u017di\u017eek) pointed out that there are also \u201cunknown knowns\u201d — \u201call the unconscious beliefs and prejudices that determine how we perceive reality.\u201d<\/p>\n

In statistics, something called Cromwell\u2019s Rule cautions us never to bed absolute certainties (probabilities of 0 or 1) into our models. Still, \u201cunknown knowns\u201d fly easily under the radar, usually in the form of natural language. Spiegelhalter tells how, in 1961, John F Kennedy authorised the invasion of the Bay of Pigs, quite unaware of the minatory statistics underpinning the phrase \u201cfair chance\u201d in an intelligence briefing.<\/p>\n

From this, you could draw a questionable moral: that the more we quantify the world, the better our decisions will be. Nate Silver — poker player, political pundit and author of 2012\u2019s The Signal and the Noise — finds much to value in this idea. On the Edge, though, is more about the unforeseen consequences that follow.<\/p>\n

There is a sprawling social ecosystem out there that Silver dubs \u201cthe River\u201d, which includes \u201ceveryone from low-stakes poker pros just trying to grind out a living to crypto kings and adventure-capital billionaires.\u201d On the Edge is, among many other things, a cracking piece of popular anthropology.<\/p>\n

Riverians accept that it is very hard to be certain about anything; they abandon certainty for games of chance; and they end up treating everything as a market to be played.<\/p>\n

Remember those chippy, cheeky chancers immortalised in films like 21 (2008: MIT\u2019s Blackjack Team takes on Las Vegas) and Moneyball (2011: a young economist up-ends baseball)?<\/p>\n

More than a decade has passed, and they\u2019re not buccaneers any more. Today, says Silver, \u201cthe Riverian mindset is coming from inside the house.\u201d<\/p>\n

You don\u2019t need to be a David Spiegelhalter to be a Riverian. All you need is the willingness to take bets on very long odds.<\/p>\n

Professional gamblers learn when and how how to do this, and this is why that subset of gamblers called Silicon Valley venture capitalists are willing to back wilful contrarians like Elon Musk (on a good day) and (on a bad day) Ponzi-scheming crypto-crooks like Sam Bankman-Fried.<\/p>\n

Success as a Riverian isn\u2019t guaranteed. As Silver points out, \u201ca lot of the people who play poker for a living would be better off — at least financially — doing something else.\u201d Then again, those who make it in the VC game expect to double their money every four years. And those who find they\u2019ve backed a Google or a SpaceX can find themselves living in a very odd world indeed.<\/p>\n

Recently the billionaire set has been taking an interest and investing in \u201ceffective altruism\u201d, a hyper-utilitarian dish cooked up by Oxford philosopher Will MacAskill. \u201cEA\u201d promises to multiply the effectiveness of acts of charity by studying their long-term effectiveness — a approach that naturally appeals to minds focused on quantification. Silver describes the state of the current movement, \u201cstuck in the uncanny valley between being abstractly principled and ruthlessly pragmatic, with the sense that you can kind of make it up as you go along\u201d. Who here didn\u2019t see that one coming? Most of the original EA set now spend their time agonising over the apocalyptic potential of artificial intelligence.<\/p>\n

The trick to Riverian thinking is to decouple things, in order to measure their value. Rather than say, \u201cThe Chick-fil-A CEO\u2019s views on gay marriage have put me off my lunch,\u201d you say, \u201cthe CEO\u2019s views are off-putting, but this is a damn fine sandwich — I\u2019ll invest.\u201d<\/p>\n

That such pragmatism might occasionally ding your reputation, we\u2019ll take as read. But what happens when you do the opposite, glomming context after context onto every phenomenon in pursuit of some higher truth? Soon everything becomes morally equivalent to everything else and thinking becomes impossible.<\/p>\n

Silver mentions a December 2023 congressional hearing in which the tone-deaf presidents of Harvard, Penn and MIT, in their sophomoric efforts to be right about all things all at once all the time, managed to argue their way into anti-Semitism. (It\u2019s on YouTube if you haven\u2019t seen it already. The only thing I can compare it to is how The Fast Show\u2019s unlucky Alf used to totter invariably toward the street\u2019s only open manhole.) No wonder that the left-leaning, non-Riverian establishment in politics and education is becoming, in Silver\u2019s words, \u201ca small island threatened by a rising tide of disapproval.\u201d<\/p>\n

We\u2019d be foolish in the extreme to throw in our lot with the Riverians, though: people whose economic model reduces to: Bet long odds on the hobby-horses of contrarian asshats and never mind what gets broken in the process.<\/p>\n

If we want a fairer, more equally apportioned world, these books should convince us that we should be spending less time worrying about what people are thinking, and concern ourselves more with how people are thinking.<\/p>\n

We cannot afford to be ridden by unknown knowns.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Reading Nate Silver’s On the Edge and The Art of Uncertainty by David Spiegelhalter for the Spectator The Italian actuary Bruno de Finetti, writing in 1931, was explicit: \u201cProbability,\u201d he wrote, \u201cdoes not exist.\u201d Probability, it\u2019s true, is simply the … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617,78],"tags":[384,383,223,975,974,641,1187,1188],"class_list":["post-3991","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books-reviews-and-opinion","category-reviews-and-opinion","tag-economics","tag-gambling","tag-mathematics","tag-poker","tag-probability","tag-risk","tag-silicon-valley","tag-venture-capital"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.simonings.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3991","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.simonings.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.simonings.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.simonings.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.simonings.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3991"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.simonings.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3991\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3992,"href":"http:\/\/www.simonings.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3991\/revisions\/3992"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.simonings.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3991"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.simonings.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3991"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.simonings.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3991"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}